Skip to main content
Review draft • 14 October 2026 • New Banking project • Implementation not started.

Definition and responsibility

The API and data-health module defines how authorised channels and contracted systems exchange facts and instructions. It owns transport contracts and freshness evidence; business modules still decide eligibility and confirm financial outcomes. Read the module comparison map for the whole platform and the glossary for shared terms. Planned operating duties: Client integration team; API operator; source owner; operations exception officer. Access to these duties requires the approved institution permission matrix. The bank or authorised regulated entity owns product policy and financial outcomes. Platform operators receive no automatic customer-data, fund-movement or issuer authority.

Worked Indian example

Use the four stages below to distinguish the initial facts, the action to test, confirmed completion and the alternate result. This example exercises this module’s responsibility; related modules still own the handoffs listed above. Fictional requirements illustration, not seeded data or approved banking policy. Reference: OP-001 / provider timeout. No real customer, regulator approval, provider connection or bank operation is asserted. Illustrative amounts have currency INR and scale 2; actual economics/authority must be supplied by the institution.

Module flow diagrams

Read each flow from top to bottom. Rectangles are actions or recorded outcomes; diamonds are decisions; labelled arrows show the next permitted route. The denial route stops the operation. The pending/unknown route keeps the original reference for investigation instead of claiming success. Each diagram corresponds to the numbered journey below. Planned workflows are shown below. Execution depends on confirmed institution policy and interface contracts.

Flow 1: Register scoped client to monitor events and reconcile

Flow 2: Timeout or invalid webhook to reconcile authoritative state

Required features

Planned functionality is listed below. Implementation requires confirmed field definitions, permissions, state transitions and product economics for the selected offering.

Required configuration

API scopes; versions; source authority; retry; idempotency; webhooks; ordering; freshness; rate limits. Store approved values in versioned, effective-dated product/programme policy. Capture the exact configuration version used by an instruction. Missing mandatory configuration blocks the dependent action; enabling a menu cannot grant legal authority.

End-to-end journey 1

Register scoped client → validate synthetic contract tests → certify with bank/provider → enable approved programme → monitor events and reconcile. The journey ends only when its authoritative result, customer/staff-visible result and related book or case history agree. A saved request, queue entry or HTTP acknowledgement is an intermediate state.

End-to-end journey 2

Timeout or invalid webhook → retain bounded evidence → retry/query safely by original reference → quarantine conflicts → reconcile authoritative state. Every transition needs an authorised actor, original version and recorded reason where required. Cancellation or client disconnection does not prove server rollback. Financial corrections retain their original reference and use linked reversal/adjustment entries rather than deleting history.

Interfaces and data dependencies

Named bank/provider contracts; connector owner; signed event schemas; status/finality; commissioning evidence. Agree stable institution, product, party and operation references; source version; as-of time; completeness; status/finality; retry rules and correction handling. Where no financial posting occurs, record the administrative/case outcome instead of inventing a journal. All channel requests use server-verified identity and institution scope. Partner, branch and customer access is narrower than institution membership. Lists, details, search, exports, callbacks and files must enforce the same boundary.

Current implementation and reuse

New Banking project: proposed, not built. Versioned APIs, scoped source clients/mappings and snapshot ingestion are reusable foundations; no execution connectors. Reviewed legacy feature boundaries: source-clients, source-mappings, account-snapshots, health. See the source inventory on the gap page. Legacy feature presence is a reuse candidate, not acceptance or deployment evidence for this module.

Acceptance criteria and exception scenarios

Explicit cases: Forged callback; key rotation in flight; sequence gap; duplicate callback; stale account projection.
  • Allowed success: confirm saved/output values, authoritative status and the exact approved actor/channel.
  • Denial: reject foreign institution, unauthorised branch/customer/programme and revoked or expired access without information leakage.
  • Reliability: prove stale-version rejection and concurrency behaviour; retryable commands apply one economic effect; unknown financial outcomes are reconciled by original reference.
  • Records and usability: preserve redacted audit, monetary precision and document integrity; verify keyboard/mobile, direct links, expired sessions, Back/Forward and return navigation. Internal web navigation preserves its workspace.
Apply the scenario matrix and the shared journey rules. Timing, amounts and regulatory applicability are institution-owned inputs, not defaults supplied by this document.

Required implementation inputs

Status: Pending institution confirmation. Connector implementation owner and authoritative outcome interface/version. Implementation dependencies and approvals are recorded in the decision register. Module register · Offering compatibility